It was not said during the debate, but afterwards before they cleared the stage and what Warren didn't realize (or care about) was the fact that the mics were still hot. She even refused to shake Bernie's outstretched hand; that shows how teed-off she was. If I were to venture a guess, I'd say Warren is probably telling the truth this time (rare, but even a stopped clock is right twice a day) when she says Bernie spoke words to the effect of 'a woman will not be elected President anytime soon.' One thing is certain; either Bernie is lying, she's a real good actress, or it's a combination of both. He denied it and for good reason: If he fessed up to it, he'd lose a large share of his voter base.
To add insult to injury, Crooked Hillary recently came out against Sanders and really stuck it to him by saying nobody likes him. She's wrong, of course. People who think everything in life ought to be given to them for free like him a whole lot. Coincidentally, free everything is the same message Warren is putting out. They're dividing the socialist vote between them, and that's fine with me. People who think others should work to subsidize their lives aren't going to vote Republican in any event. And it was really laughable to see Hillary stick a shiv in Bernie's back after he went the extra measure to endorse her after he lost the nod to her 4 years ago in the most rigged primary ever. I'm sure he's not ... pissed off or anything, but then again I'd like to see his EKG readouts when he heard that news. Hopefully, they didn't rise to the level of giving him another heart attack during primary season. In any event I'm giving odds his systolic blood pressure number rose considerably.
I confess I'm guilty of shadenfreude here. It's great to see 20 liberals shrink to 6 on stage, and their audiences are nothing more than sycophants lapping up every word. It's a waiting game. Spartacus Booker was the last one to leave the race as of this writing, and of course he took a jab at why he performed so poorly - he blamed it on race like Kamala Harris did, and of course the humor here is that the folks that they called racists were fellow Democrats because that's how the primary system works. You can only get the nod from your fellow party members, and if you call them racists, it doesn't bode well for your extended future.
Those who last the longest begin to show their fangs as the numbers shrink. Eating each other is now acceptable, and it's not a long shot to say they see Trump doing well as he uses attack strategy and are taking a page out of his book by telling it as they see it in simple understandable language.
Ah, this week has been humorous and the NY Times jumped in to amuse us by endorsing Warren for President and Klobuchar for Veep. The gray lady has a rather predictable legacy in her endorsements; since 1884 they have endorsed 26 Democrats and only 6 Republicans (the last Republican they endorsed was Eisenhower probably because he was a war hero).They started endorsing in 1860 with Republican Lincoln, then Grant, then Hayes and Garfield. You should note the Republicans were the abolitionists then and the Democrats ... well, they invented domestic terrorism by forming a group that rode around on horses at night wearing sheets. In a short 2 decades, the Times drifted left and has pretty much stayed there since.
Warren and Klobuchar would be a disaster for this country; we'd have a fake Indian in the Oval Office defecating on private industry while Klobuchar would be cussing out the staff on a regular basis (something she is famous for).
Every time I look at Mount Rushmore, I understand more clearly why there are no Democrats up there. My guess is God took a long look at it and decided to use divine intervention rather then risk it getting spoiled. I strongly suspect the Presidents whose faces are on there at present are probably lobbying God to keep it Democrat free.
If only we could get the Supreme Architect of the Universe to do the same to DC. Just imagine, if a President who has been assailed every day for 3 years can get the country running better than it has since WW2 .... how much better it would be if he didn't have to fight the distractions every day.
That, of course, is why Donald Trump is on the way to re-election in November. When things are good (and they are), the majority of sane people are going to vote to keep it that way.
The insane ones, of course are going to vote for a communist this November.
No comments:
Post a Comment